
The title alone implies a topic most may find cheesy, but who am I to be blamed? I haven’t had any intellectual breakthrough the whole day, proof of which is the fact that my biorhythm calculator estimates my intellectual health would be down for the next 24 hours or so. So if the topic alone makes you cringe, like, *eeew*, you are free to abort your reading session. =)
Now let’s set our sights on the topic at hand. As you are reading now some of you may have just listened (or been listening) to a sad love song; others may have been reading (or have just read) stories about unrequited love and romance-turned-tragedy passages. Throughout history, people seem to be enjoying those kinds of material – Man meets girl, both fall madly; parents object, boy and girl defy the odds; man dies in the process, girl kills herself as well. In reality, the scenes are as grim as the cases of murder we stumble upon while reading our daily newspapers. They seem romantic and heartfelt when you read it, but I bet you won’t like it very much to see those scenes unfold right before your very eyes. You sing a song about having your interest as the ‘only thing you’re living for’, and that you’d rather what, ‘die than live without him/her’? I bet you guys won’t even bat an eyelash anymore just months after your failed relationships.
So what makes these passages click to the masses like hot chocolates? For one thing, imagining someone (more often a guy) making himself a fool for love – doing things for a girl, giving his all, being a martyr for someone not ready at the time to reciprocate his love – is one hell of a chivalry. Women would definitely love to see a guy turning things around – from chauvinist to chivalrous. Truth is, guys are simply rational than romantic. True. Seriously. Throughout time, men would rather give up their love interest in exchange of convenience and to elude any looming odds along the way. Women, however, do their process the other way around.
When love is unrequited, it’s the guys who simply walk off and feign that everything is alright. I don’t know, but as a guy I think most of us feel and act that way. What about women? Simply put, they are the major stockholders of the I Can’t Let Go Firm, where everybody there pretends failed relationships are part of human nature. But is it really that way? One thing: Letting go should NOT be a phase. We only say a situation is a phase when it is part of human nature. Why, an adage was even coined, saying ‘some guys just have all the luck’ – something that apparently states some guys don’t even experience reasonable pain (or severe, excruciating pain) in their lives. A phase can last a period, a time, a moment… or eons. And I think nobody would love treating letting go as a phase for the ages.
Well, letting go should be an ART. It is something you should perfect. It’s like a skill; you do it the first time, things won’t be easy. You do it the next time, things become much easier. Then time comes that you have mastered it, you don’t find yourself brooding for the loss of something or someone for a long period of time. The art of letting go applies not only in our topic above, but in other things as well.
I’ll give you an example: Suppose you own a wallet. It’s not expensive; you may have bought it at a bargain price, or your mom gave it to you decades ago. Nevertheless, you simply treasure your wallet – you put important things there: your cash, cards, pictures, and even small notes. It doesn’t look like the best Louis Vuitton or a Gianni Versace signature design, but you always open it; you take out and put in things you need everyday.
One day your wallet got lost. Together with it are your money, cards, pictures, and small important notes. At first you find it hard to get over the loss. Should it be apt, then, to say you should undergo a ‘phase’ – which is letting go? Of course, the answer is no. Remember, you could have taken measures on how to prevent that thing to happen. Losing a wallet is not human nature; neglecting to be wary and take measures to prevent such things is what humans tend to do. If it’s not a phase, clearly it should be a skill – an art – one should master. At first, you tend to mope. You think the wallet might be returned along with your valuables. Then you hesitate to buy a new one, thinking you only want your wallet and not any other else.
Suddenly, you find yourself having the impulse to buy a new wallet. At first you don’t use it that much; you seldom bring it with you. As times go by, however, you begin to bring it more often. Then you start to put some things in it – your cash, then your cards. Then you put your pictures. Then you put the small things which have sentimental values to you. Then it will occur to you that you have already stopped thinking of your lost wallet, finally thinking that wherever your wallet may be (or whoever has it), it may be found by someone who is in dire need. And you start anew, taking in the precautions you forgot to consider the first time out.
That’s the point: Letting go should not be like a phase in which it happens like our systems’ integral cycles. Once you’ve mastered it as an art, I think crimes and suicide lines would be decimated by a large number.
And the passages most women would love to read? Well, they stay as they are: Mere passages that fascinate readers but aren’t scintillating at all in real life.